Shannon Stoy/Blink34/BlinkonCrime…BOC Bored Housewife?
by messageboardpowertrips
Years ago, I used to read a site that the (now deceased) Sean Krause kept up called “ThedailyBS.” He kept most everyone in line on the Anthony case—he emailed Mark Nejame, interviewed the REAL Zenaida, and he had a big, fat opinion about the likes of Blink, aka Shannon Stoy, and other bored housewives.
After Sean’s death, Shannon went on to file a complaint against Jose Baez that was summarily dismissed. (OR, DISSED AND DISMISSED….) in his favor…..seems someone who claimed to have so much against the Anthonys and their foundation would have EASILY won against a creature like Baez. Yet? She didn’t.
Blink34 was summarily banned from her perch at Websleuths and then started a little known (yet blinking, funny enough—blinking- ad riddled site) with the help of some monkeys.
Blink has been claiming “insider info” for years—as well as a “relationship” with Melich, Mark Nejame, Leonard Padilla….and about anyone with a pulse.
YET…! Her “column” gives the reader nothing but salacious promises and no return. No damned wonder Sean Krause found her such an easy target–a twice divorced housewife with nothing better to do, aside for perhaps fight for custody of blink and blinkette?? (I dunno if he had that right…but he was never far off the mark about Ms Blinker)
Why don’t Blink’s followers simply demand the truth, instead of misspelled words in bolded print (and will Blink/Shannon ever realize that YOUR is misspelled, since she constantly types that for the contraction YOU ARE +YOU’RE???)?
She has over-promised….financial 411, some kind of BS about a plumber, clogged drains, and why Cindy was so “upset” over the clogged drain? Maybe Blink’s just a-waitin’ to buy a Momma doll? Yeah…I don’t think so. She is lying and so few on her site call her out (they just fade away).
So what’s up with Blink and why is her name is apropros? She claimed it was after Malcolm Gladwell’s novel “Blink,” but clearly…as her readers ask (over and over) about the drain on the Anthony property and all her insider 411, Shannon Stoy BLINKS. HARD!! While she Blinks, she can’t see your comments….
Fess up, Shannon….you have been called out for years now. This BS of insider info? Maybe your Canadian ragdolls buy it.
Spill it. You know Sean Krause called you out and now that the case is over? What is left to hide behind??
tellmetellmelies 
Loved this…
Email me
So true!! Blink has promised insider info on the Anthony case and for MONTHS and months and months…Part 3 on the West Memphis 3.
Why not just deliver? Why don’t her “followers” call her out?
And WHY won’t she properly spell you’re???? LLL
I stumbled on this forum and found it rang so true.
I refuse to respond to Blink aka Ms Shannon Stoy Moser at her site since she purposely edited out my content and replaced it with her own nastiness as shown below:
==================
Truthiness says:
May 6, 2012 at 11:59 am
Wildflower, Loma, and now Truthiness- How little can you possibly have going on in your life for such drivel?
ps. I get the “your” right in this one. Yay me!
B
==================
Does the B stand for Bitch?
Here is my comment in reply:
Dear B,
I would like to extend to you my sincerest gratitude for your not disclosing my IP and email address in your “reply” inside my posting on your site. By removing the content in my comment and inserting your own response with my previous screen names used at your site, you did so only to again belittle and censor any content you do not agree with.
Further, you only whetted the appetite of your readers which in my opinion, take way too much pleasure in and use the bulk of content on your site running elaborate background checks on people which have very little to do with any actual crime committed, as exampled by the posting of Richard Hornsby’s criminal background of traffic tickets on your site and the current posting into Isabel Celis’s uncle’s criminal record. It seems to be the focus your site and has taken away from real discussion. Once upon a time, I used to enjoy reading at your site, before I wised up to the BS.
Without allowing my comment and the link I provided to be seen by your viewers which was:
and my comment which was simply a heads up to you about this site as perhaps you could find it helpful as constructive criticism, since you consistently delete/ban comments that question you and obviously, your readership has suffered due to your behavior.
As I have, by my estimate made approx 10-12 comments at your site over 3 years, I did not keep track my screen names used closely, but I do know one was banned by you for my politely and repeatedly inquiring as to your background, qualifications and/or education in law or law enforcement, which you ignored, deleted and then banned. I am still very curious as to what makes you feel justified in posting your theories on criminal cases, however, after reading several of your case predictions (i.e, the Anthony plumbing conspiracy, personally reporting Jose Baez to the Florida Bar for disqualification and who can forget the infamous, “easy peasy”) displays questionable skills and journalist ethics. I think I am not the only reader that has consistently found your cryptic comments do not carry any weight and you give yourself laughable and undue credit for helping law enforcement solve cases Please do correct me if I am wrong, and you truly have “inside sources” and are willing to solve the mystery of your background and/or qualifications.
Perhaps you will keep in mind, you are no Valhall, as she is truly much nicer and credible.
My hope is that my comment will help you present yourself in a more appropriate manner.
Truthiness
PS. LOL @Canadian Ragdolls!